While the quality of online news is improving, repression is modernising, with growing control of the internet, the only space where an independent press finds freedom of expression.
Media landscape
Wrecked by a succession of repressive reforms since 1997, the media landscape has wrecked the media are essentially a propaganda outlet for the Kazakh regime. Only a handful of independent outlets remain. They include Zvlast.kz, Ouralskaya Nedelya, and the KazTAG press agency. But professional journalists have launched alternative projects on YouTube, Telegram and Instagram, such as Protenge, Za Nami Uzhe Vyekhali and Guiperborei (Hyperborea), which contradict the narrative of pro-government media.
Political context
The government is determined to control information. Authorities use all available means – arrests, assaults, telecommunications blackouts, internet shutdowns – to prevent coverage of major events, such as the unprecedented anti-government protests that shook the country in January 2022. Access to information is limited, and journalists’ questions in governmental briefings are censored. The government pays private media to disseminate regime propaganda. The government controls the appointment of top editors in state-owned and state-controlled media. The Ministry of Information itself serves as a media regulatory agency.
Legal framework
Even though the constitution prohibits censorship, it still exists. Defamation has been decriminalised, but “knowingly spreading false information” has not. The right to the confidentiality of sources can be lifted by a simple judicial order. The ongoing reform of the media law may further tighten the government’s grip on the media.
Economic context
State support for the media depends directly on their promoting the government agenda and official propaganda. Independent media, deprived of government subsidies, rely entirely on advertising. For that, they compete with pro-government media, who have the resources to lower advertising rates.
Sociocultural context
Journalism is viewed with widespread suspicion in society. By contrast, citizens are quick to believe bloggers or anonymous posts on social networks. When journalists’ handling of an issue is unpopular, they are commonly accused of corruption. Hindrances to reporters’ work are frequently due to ignorance of the law. Security agents from the government and private companies don’t hesitate to use force against reporters.
Safety
Journalism is viewed with widespread suspicion in society. By contrast, citizens are quick to believe bloggers or anonymous posts on social networks. When journalists’ handling of an issue is unpopular, they are commonly accused of corruption. Hindrances to reporters’ work are frequently due to ignorance of the law. Security agents from the government and private companies don’t hesitate to use force against reporters.